<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Craig McGill - writer and dad blogger &#187; White House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craig-mcgill.com/tag/white-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craig-mcgill.com</link>
	<description>Blogging about kids, playing with tech toys with kids and writing/popular culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:40:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New White House 2.0 site is good PR</title>
		<link>http://craig-mcgill.com/2009/01/new-white-house-20-site-is-good-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://craig-mcgill.com/2009/01/new-white-house-20-site-is-good-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craig-mcgill.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House website has had a makeover and a half with Barack Obama and the Democrat team coming on board. The layout is a lot more web2.0 and it will be interesting to see how the various pages &#8211; like the press pool page &#8211; are filled in over the coming months.
For some it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">White House</a> website has had a makeover and a half with Barack Obama and the Democrat team coming on board. The layout is a lot more web2.0 and it will be interesting to see how the various pages &#8211; like the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/pool/">press pool page</a> &#8211; are filled in over the coming months.</p>
<p>For some it may be a little thing, for others it may be a stunt (for example, <a href="http://www.kottke.org/09/01/the-countrys-new-robotstxt-file">there&#8217;s</a> already <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10146802-38.html">a debate</a> going on about the <a href="http://donklephant.com/2009/01/21/new-white-house-website-open-to-search-engines/">robots.txt file</a>) but it&#8217;s another symbol of change being brought in at all levels and <a href="http://www.nevillehobson.com/2009/01/21/the-white-house-20/">another example of how the web is being recognised as an integral part of communicating</a> with the public.</p>
<p>For now, it&#8217;s fantastic PR &#8211; it not only shows a new approach to chatting with the public, it shows fresh thinking &#8211; and with the good design it shows that it&#8217;s thinking about the user.</p>
<p>There is a downside to this though: you can just bet in the UK that most politicians will miss the point of what makes the site work and we&#8217;ll see a raft of poorly-thought out imitators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://craig-mcgill.com/2009/01/new-white-house-20-site-is-good-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Barack Obama actually get Social Networking/web2.0? He appears to have dumped Twitter</title>
		<link>http://craig-mcgill.com/2008/11/does-barack-obama-actually-get-social-networkingweb20-he-appears-to-have-dumped-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://craig-mcgill.com/2008/11/does-barack-obama-actually-get-social-networkingweb20-he-appears-to-have-dumped-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craig-mcgill.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s true that the honeymoon doesn&#8217;t last long in politics anymore. It&#8217;s started to be spotted that Barack Obama hasn&#8217;t used Twitter since winning the US Presidential Election. Now, I doubt anyone actually thought that it was BO himself sending the messages, but it does show one thing about web2.0 interaction: once you start, you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that the honeymoon doesn&#8217;t last long in politics anymore. It&#8217;s started to be spotted that <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/BarackObama">Barack Obama</a></strong> hasn&#8217;t used <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a></strong> since winning the <strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008">US Presidential Election</a></strong>. Now, I doubt anyone actually thought that it was BO himself sending the messages, but it does show one thing about web2.0 interaction: once you start, you really have to continue or at least direct people to another place to keep it going because otherwise people start to lose confidence in your message and what &#8211; if anything &#8211; you were trying to sell them.</p>
<p>Otherwise people are just going to feel that Twitter was used because it was seen as a way of getting in touch with an audience (d&#8217;uh) and that could lead to some thinking Obama&#8217;s just like the rest of the politicians and just uses people/issues/platforms as needed and then dumps them after &#8211; and if he can do it with Twitter, what about other issues?</p>
<p>If the plan was to just use Twitter in the build-up, then the last post should have been to direct people to sites like <a href="http://www.change.gov/">Change.gov</a>.</p>
<p>Only time will tell though. It may just be a temporary blip. Let&#8217;s be honest, the staff deserve a few days off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://craig-mcgill.com/2008/11/does-barack-obama-actually-get-social-networkingweb20-he-appears-to-have-dumped-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->